Problem statement
In most teams, critical decisions emerge from conversations. They happen across:- Chats
- Comments
- Documents
- AI-assisted discussions
- The same questions are asked again
- Past decisions are reopened without context
- New team members lack historical understanding
- Teams repeat work or mistakes
Core shift introduced by Membria
Membria does not replace communication tools. It introduces a structural shift: Conversation is treated as input. Decision is treated as output. Chats are transient. Decisions are durable.Conceptual flow
1. Normal team behavior
Teams continue working as usual:- Discussing in chat
- Reviewing documents
- Using AI assistants
- Making decisions informally
2. Decision capture (DBB)
In the background, the Decision Black Box (DBB):- Observes conversational and document context
- Detects moments of resolution or commitment
- Extracts decisions, assumptions, and rationale
3. Persistence as institutional memory
Captured decisions are:- Stored in the workspace knowledge graph
- Linked to original context and sources
- Shared across the team
- Chat history
- Individual users
- Tool boundaries
4. Visibility via the Decision Surface
Persisted decisions are rendered through the Decision Surface. The Decision Surface exposes:- Open or unresolved decisions
- Decisions that have drifted
- Repeated decisions and patterns
- Decisions without outcomes
5. Compounding intelligence
When users interact with AI later:- Answers are grounded in prior team decisions
- Responses reference real outcomes and context
- Repetition and contradiction are reduced
Resulting system behavior
Membria transforms:- Conversations -> decisions
- Decisions -> persistent memory
- Memory -> higher-quality future decisions
Why this matters
Most tools optimize for short-term interaction. They forget by design. Membria optimizes for continuity. It remembers by default. This is the difference between:- Productivity tools
- Institutional intelligence systems